Menu

Zhengzhou municipal government sued the public discontent road renamed for the restoration of. 瀬名アスカ

0 Comments

Zhengzhou municipal government sued the public discontent road renamed for the restoration of name – reporter Han Jingwei Washington on February 2nd at 9:30 in the morning, the Xinxiang intermediate people’s court held a public hearing of the Zhengzhou Municipal People’s government and the plaintiff Zhu Mouyi 4 people accused the government to revoke the notice request and restore the original Ji Cheng Lu Road name "case. The plaintiff, Zhu Mouyi, he Moumou, Zhu Mouniu, song Moumou and their entrusted agents were accused by the Zhengzhou Municipal People’s government to appear in the lawsuit. More than 80 people, including representatives of provincial and municipal people’s congresses, CPPCC members, administrative law professors, mass representatives of Zhengzhou City sacrifice community, Zhengzhou Municipal People’s government and some members of Zhengzhou Municipal Civil Affairs Bureau, attended the trial. Review, dissatisfaction with the Festival City Road name, citizens sued the municipal government in April 14, 2015, the Zhengzhou Municipal People’s government made a decision to Zhengzhou, "offering (Zha) city road" was renamed "road safety", and in May 21, 2015, the government published online on [2015]6, "Zheng Zheng Ji Cheng Lu Ping An Avenue was renamed notice" (hereinafter referred to as the "notice"). Zhengzhou citizens Zhu Mouyi five believes that the "notice" in violation of the provisions of the State Council "names management regulations", then in September 2015 16 to Xinxiang City Intermediate People’s Court of administrative proceedings, request the court to revoke the Zhengzhou Municipal People’s government "on the Festival City Road renamed Peace Avenue Zheng Masamichi No. [2015]6 notice", and asked the restoration of the original "Ji Cheng Lu lu. According to the regulation of the provincial court of higher court on the supplementary jurisdiction over administrative cases, the people’s Government of Zhengzhou, as the defendant’s first instance administrative case, is under the jurisdiction of the intermediate people’s Court of Xinxiang. After putting on record, the intermediate people’s Court of Xinxiang shall notify the people’s Government of Zhengzhou according to law. The people’s Government of Zhengzhou has submitted the "reply" and the evidence and basis of the defendant’s administrative action to the intermediate people’s Court of Xinxiang within the statutory time limit. In December 24, 2015, Li Moumou, one of the five plaintiffs, such as Zhengzhou citizen Zhu Mouyi, submitted to the Xinxiang intermediate people’s court the application for withdrawal of the prosecution, which had been approved. The plaintiff, the original road with historical and cultural significance of the trial, the plaintiffs, the Zhengzhou Municipal People’s government "Zheng Masamichi No. [2015]6 announcement does not conform to the State Council" names management regulations "article fifth," Henan province names management measures "seventh, eighth first and nineteenth city names; offering ancient records of history more than 3500 years, has been used since 2003; the whole village migrated out of the old Ji Cheng Ji Bo Town, the road just after Ji Bo City ruins. In December 2005, the road was officially declared by the people’s Government of Zhengzhou city as "sacrifice City Road". The name of the road has profound historical and cultural significance, and the nearby residents have deep feelings for the name of the "City Road", and strongly call for the restoration of the name of the original city road. The name for the original name. That way the pronunciation of rare Zhengzhou Municipal People’s Government on defense, the renamed no legal relationship with the plaintiff, the plaintiff did not infringe the legitimate rights and interests of four, does not belong to the administrative litigation case by the people’s court; renamed mainly follow the "one road one 5

郑州市民不满道路更名 状告市政府要求恢复原名   □记者韩景玮   本报讯2月2日上午9时30分,新乡中院公开开庭审理了“原告朱某义等4人诉被告郑州市人民政府请求政府撤 销通告并恢复祭城路原路名”一案。原告朱某义、贺某某、朱某妞、宋某某及其各委托代理人,被告郑州市人民政府的委托代理人到庭参加诉讼。部分省、市人大代 表、政协委员、行政法学专家教授、郑州市“祭城社区”的群众代表、郑州市人民政府和郑州市民政局的部分工作人员等80余人旁听了庭审。   回顾丨不满祭城路更名,市民状告市政府   2015年4月14日,郑州市人民政府作出决定,将郑州市“祭(zha)城路”更名为“平安大道”,并于2015年5月21日,在政府网上发布了郑政通[2015]6号《关于祭城路更名平安大道的通告》(以下简称《通告》)。   郑州市民朱某义等五人认为,该《通告》违背了国务院《地名管理条例》的规定,遂于2015年9月16日向新乡市中级人民法院提起行政诉讼,请求法院判决郑州市人民政府撤销《关于祭城路更名平安大道的通告》郑政通[2015]6号文,并要求恢复原“祭城路”路名。   根 据省高院《关于行政案件异地管辖补充规定》的规定,郑州市人民政府作为被告的一审行政案件,由新乡市中级人民法院管辖。新乡市中级人民法院立案后,依法通 知郑州市人民政府应诉。郑州市人民政府在法定期限内,向新乡市中级人民法院递交了《答辩状》及被诉行政行为的证据和依据。   2015年12月24日,郑州市民朱某义等五原告之一的李某某,向新乡市中级人民法院提交撤回起诉的申请,已裁定予以准许。   原告丨原路名有历史文化意义   庭 审中,原告诉称,郑州市人民政府“郑政通[2015]6号文”公告不符合国务院《地名管理条例》第五条、《河南省地名管理办法》第七条、第八条第一项和第 十九条;祭城地名古书记载历史有3500多年,一直沿用至今;2003年祭城村整体迁移出老祭伯城,所修路正好经过祭伯城遗址。   2005年12月,该路被郑州市人民政府正式公告命名为“祭城路”,该路名具有深远历史文化意义,附近居民对“祭城路”名具有深厚感情,强烈要求恢复原祭城路的名称。   被告丨改名因原路名读音生僻   被 告郑州市人民政府答辩认为,此次更名与原告无法律上的利害关系,并未侵犯四原告的合法权益,不属于人民法院行政诉讼的受案范围;更名主要遵循“一路一名” 和便民的原则,“祭(zha)”字读音生僻,与标准读音(ji或zhai)相差甚远,给外来客商和民众带来不便,在沿线单位提出更名申请的基础上,经征求 道路两侧驻地群众、单位的意见,大部分同意更名,根据《河南省地名管理办法》第九条等有关规定,依法定程序,经郑州市人民政府常务会议研究决定,作出更名 行为,符合相关法律法规。   庭审中,合议庭根据双方当事人的诉辩主张,对本案的争议焦点进行了归纳,双方围绕被诉《通告》是否属于行政诉讼受案范围、四原告是否具有原告诉讼主体资格以及被告作出《通告》是否合法等焦点进行了举证、质证,充分地陈述和辩论。   庭审持续到14时45分结束,法庭宣布将择期宣判。 责任编辑:徐童 SN155相关的主题文章: